Tags
Motown M 1022 (A), November 1961
b/w White House Twist
(Written by Berry Gordy and Barney Ales)
Ah yes. This, for those of you just joining us from Mars, is a record inspired by the Twist, a national dance craze inspired in turn by Chubby Checker’s 1960 #1 hit, The Twist.
(I’d make a joke about you not needing me to provide the usual YouTube link here, so ubiquitous is Checker’s hit, except that actually it’s VERY HARD to find an online copy of the original record – Checker himself re-recorded the song in the 1970s, drenched in hissy echoey hi-hat and soulless dry mixing, and that seems to be the version that’s spread itself all over YouTube like nasty 70s pondweed. So here is apparently the only copy of the 1960s version that anyone’s uploaded).
(Checker’s record was itself a toned-down, edges-sanded-off cover of an earlier B-side by Hank Ballard, apparently too raw to find favour with preppy whites, or something.)
The Twist was a big hit, sparking a dance fad across the world, but it didn’t fade over the winter of 1960. Instead, Twist-mania took hold in earnest in the spring of 1961. Checker’s year-old record ended up as the soundtrack of a second successive summer, while dancers at record hops and clubs eschewed newer hits, demanding the opportunity to show off their best well-honed Twist moves.
Gordy had initially attempted to latch on to the trend by trying to start up his own astroturf dance craze with the Contours’ second single, The Stretch; the attempt failed.
By the winter of 1961, with Checker’s single now rocketing back up the charts (it ended up back at number one) and his follow-up Let’s Twist Again –
(once again, hard to find on YouTube, which is awash with cruddy re-records – the only clip of the original I can find has film dialogue over the start of it, sorry) –
…also in the Top Ten and all over the airwaves, the dance had moved from craze to phenomenon. Spotting a good business opportunity, another act, Joey Dee and the Starliters, knocked out the “homage” The Peppermint Twist –
(and by this point, Hank Ballard aside, the desperately shoddy level of Twist coverage on YouTube is really starting to annoy me, this only extant copy of the original version of the Peppermint Twist again having film dialogue on it. Hey! YouTube Twist uploaders! Are you all total idiots? Can you seriously not tell the bleeding difference between an original record made in the Sixties, and a $1.99 bargain-bin CD re-recording? (You know the sort of thing I mean, those cheapo compilations called something like Favorite Golden Jukebox Super Oldies of America’s Favorite Dance Time With All Your Best Oldies Radio Hits of USA 1961, proudly proclaiming “all tracks performed by the original artists where possible” on the front cover, and “(but 20 years later)” hidden in tiny print on the back, meaning you get it home, tear off the shrinkwrap, stick it excitedly on the stereo and then feel your heart sink as you’re met with a burst of cheesy 80s synth horns and some vocals done by a guy who’s clearly in his early-to-mid fifties, needing the money to tide him over between headlining stints at Doo-Wop Night at the Santa Cruz Civic Center, first Tuesday of every month)? Seriously, you can’t tell? You pack of oafs. But I digress) –
…which also ended up topping the charts. A seemingly never-ending succession of small labels clamoured for a piece of the action, and so it came to pass that the market was suddenly saturated with me-too Twist records, all named (Insert Random Noun Here) Twist, all having little in common with each other except that their syncopated rhythms aped the basic pattern of Checker’s hits, making it easy for dancers to keep on Twisting.
Ironically, the glut of Twist knock-offs was too great for most of them to garner any individual attention, especially against further follow-ups from both Checker and from the Starliters (though some of the bandwagoneers did manage to break through and score decent hits – Gary “US” Bonds, Sam Cooke, the Isley Brothers). The majority sank without trace, all fighting for the same audiences, same radio airspace, same slots at record hops, choking each other like weeds blotting out the sunlight on the forest floor.
Motown was by no means immune to the temptation to jump on the Twist bandwagon. This was the first of three Twist singles released by the company within the space of a couple of weeks at the tail-end of 1961; Berry Gordy may have miscalculated the market with the Contours single, but he was never a man to turn his nose up at the chance of easy money.
“The Twistin’ Kings” were a group created by Motown solely to exploit the craze. The “group” was really the great Motown studio band, the Funk Brothers, fronted by unidentified vocalists; this is therefore the second Funk Brothers single to be issued on Motown, and the second under an assumed name (the first, Snake Walk, had been credited to “The Swingin’ Tigers” back in 1959).
The record itself is every bit as free and fun and joyful as Snake Walk, instantly likeable in its loose, raucous groove – there’s not much going on in terms of a song, more just a basic skeleton structure on which to hang an instrumental workout, but the resulting “do what you like” atmosphere leads to something almost akin to a jam session. Benny Benjamin on drums and Beans Bowles on sax are the stars of the show, along with some cracking piano riffs and a Hammond-like Ondioline part at the end.
The mystery lead vocals are well-taken, but simple in the extreme, both in terms of technique (basic) and lyrics (moronic). The Christmas references are incredibly tenuous and exceedingly loose – “everybody’s doin’ the Christmas Twist”, we’re informed some 30 or 40 times, before some perfunctory mentions of snow, yuletide and an unexpected vocal refrain of “Oooooooh… Jingle Bells”, obviously not set to the tune of “Jingle Bells”. It’s all good, nonsensical fun, though if you’re not thinking of Simpsons Christmas Boogie then you need to catch up on your television.
The thing is, though, it doesn’t really bear repeated listening. Despite it being lots of fun, and showing off some really imaginative and enjoyable playing, it’s repetitive in the extreme, and the cause is those vocals. Unlike the wholly instrumental Snake Walk, which still sounds great, the repeated vocals here (and the mundane lyrics they’re repeating) badly date the record, consigning it to the “novelty” pile, and ultimately all it does is diminish the replay value of an otherwise rocking little instrumental.
The liner notes to The Complete Motown Singles: Volume 1 feature an amazing photocopy of Berry Gordy’s handwritten instructions to rush-release both this single and an accompanying album, Twistin’ The World Around with the Twistin’ Kings. The LP seems to have been bashed out at lightning speed, appearing in stores within the month and featuring tracks such as “Old Folks Twist”, “Twist A La B.G.”, “Flying Circle Twist”, “Mexican Twist” (have you spotted the theme yet?) and “Congo Twist” (the latter being spun off as a second single a fortnight after this one), as well as a none-too-subtle “COME ON, LET’S DO THE TWIST” legend printed right across the back cover in 28-point type for good measure.
Gordy’s note is a striking artefact, emphatically determined that not a second be lost getting these records in the shops in time for the holidays. He needn’t have bothered; both the single and the album were total commercial flops, and the Twistin’ Kings were quietly swept under the carpet come 1962.
(Though that might, in retrospect, have been a good thing – if the Funk Brothers had racked up a couple of hits at this early stage, they might have ended up touring endlessly as the Twistin’ Kings to diminishing crowds through the Sixties, and who knows what kind of catastrophic effect that would have had on the Motown Sound?)
MOTOWN JUNKIES VERDICT
(I’ve had MY say, now it’s your turn. Agree? Disagree? Leave a comment, or click the thumbs at the bottom there. Dissent is encouraged!)
You’re reading Motown Junkies, an attempt to review every Motown A- and B-side ever released. Click on the “previous” and “next” buttons below to go back and forth through the catalogue, or visit the Master Index for a full list of reviews so far.
(Or maybe you’re only interested in The Funk Brothers? Click for more.)
Don McKenzie “I’ll Call You” |
The Twistin’ Kings “White House Twist” |
Gordon Frewin said:
For what it’s worth, on this particular piece of novelty-shite, be aware the CD VERSION is missing the 9-second keyboard intro (of “Jingle Bells”), as heard on the VINYL SINGLE.
LikeLike
nixonradio said:
Interesting trivia, though I think “novelty shite” is unduly harsh in this instance. (The B-side, on the other hand… Hm.) Still, as always, dissent is encouraged!
LikeLike
Robb Klein said:
I have no doubt that “The Twistin’ Kings” (at least in their Funk Brothers form) wouldn’t have been allowed to tour around USA or abroad, as they were too necessary in Motown’s studios every day. That is precisely the same situation that occurred with The Andantes (female studio background group) and The Love-Tones (male studio background group). Both groups were far better singers than several of the semi-successful Motown groups. Both were not “allowed” to have a successful released single. The Love-Tones never had a Motown single released, and The Andantes lone (VIP) single was never allowed to get past the pressing of 6 pressing plant test pressings (same as Frank Wilson’s Soul single).
LikeLike
Simon White said:
I’ve just read some harsh words here which stopped me reading further down. Why the negativity? It shows a lack of respect and in fact a certain lack of objective judgement. Without going to far in depth (because frankly it’s not really worth the bother) but in an attempt to redress the balance, the tirade of bitchery I just read regarding Chubby Checker and his version of The Twist just sounds like a teenaged girl repeating something they read elsewhere and that in itself colours your credibilty. Chubby’s version of The Twist isn’t as hard edged as Hank’s, but it’s nowhere near as different or as bad as you make out-it was just recorded a few years later and for a different audience.
For the record (ho ho) the album version of Congo Twist happens to be one of my favourite Motown (non) singles of all time. But I’ll settle for the 45.
LikeLike
The Nixon Administration said:
Come now, Simon – was that the wisest quip, given that you’re on a site dedicated in large part to music made by (and for) teenage girls…? 🙂 I’m not offended, but the sneer is a little unattractive.
You do raise an interesting point though. I’m often negative – far more negative than this, in fact – because I believe it’s the only way to achieve any kind of objectivity. Otherwise, I’d never be able to do a site like this; everything would get 8, and every page would be dull to read.
In fact, objectivity and respect, as approaches to criticism, are at their roots mutually incompatible. You either go for brutal honesty, or you ease off for non-musical, extra-textual reasons, pulling your punches; either is fine, but I don’t believe you can successfully and simultaneously adopt both philosophies.
Anyway, I don’t think this record is too bad, as you’d have discovered had you read on, but I’m always happy to take my lumps when someone feels I’ve been unduly harsh – the label says “dissent is encouraged”, and indeed it is.
I really like the LP version of Congo Twist, as you’ll see if you read my review of that one. The 45 is still good, but a pale shadow of what might have been if 12″ singles had been common in 1961.
LikeLike
Simon White said:
Critisism is in the eye of the beholder.
LikeLike
The Nixon Administration said:
No it isn’t.
LikeLike
Simon White said:
Yes it is.
So is objectivity.
LikeLike
The Nixon Administration said:
As fascinating as I’m sure the readers are finding this exchange, I think we may possibly be in danger of losing sight of your argument here.
I’m not going to suddenly start being polite about every record we come across, because I think that would probably be quite boring for the readers. It’d certainly be boring for me. But the price of me sticking my oar in and having my say is that everyone else gets the same chance too, and not for one moment would I ever argue that my opinion is somehow more worthwhile than anyone else’s – and I’ve no time whatsoever for anyone who claims otherwise.
In terms of what my opinions actually are? I don’t think Chubby Checker’s original Twist is a bad record, not at all. It does strike me as noticeably softer than the Hank one, as you yourself agree; that’s not a value judgement, that’s just an observation (I like both versions fine, they work for different reasons). Received wisdom has it that Checker’s version found easier favour with white audiences because it was an easier listen – whether that truism is actually true or not, I’ve no idea, hence the ambivalent, arm’s-length wording. The most vituperative criticism in this article – the REAL “tirade of bitchery”, if you like – is reserved for naff (in my opinion, your mileage may vary etc etc) 70s and 80s re-recordings of Fifties hits, and the duplicitous marketing and Youtube proliferation thereof. I don’t think Xmas Twist is a bad record, really, but for me it just doesn’t bear up to repeated listening. What is your opinion of this record?
LikeLike
Simon White said:
I’m glad you got back to my actual point in my first post although you now seem to be both defending your original position on The Twist and denying it. As I said though, objectivity is in the eye of the beholder and dressing the lack of it up in too many words just makes it seem less objective. I like Christmas Twist. But Congo Twist is by far the better 45 and is the best track on the album
LikeLike
The Nixon Administration said:
So… I’m now genuinely confused. What are you disagreeing with, and what would you have said instead? The floor is yours.
(I’m also genuinely interested, in case that came across as too confrontational.)
LikeLike
Kevin Moore said:
Don’t worry – your positive/negative balance is refreshing and always leaves space for competing subjective opinions. The essays I disagree with make me think and increase my enjoyment even when they don’t win me over completely (which they often do).
LikeLike
treborij said:
So, I picked up a Motown Xmas compilation a couple of weeks back (the ironically titled Motown Christmas, Vol. 2). To be honest I don’t really care for most Motown Christmas stuff but it was in a pile of supercheap discs and I noticed “Christmas Twist” was on it. I was a bit enthused because I haven’t bought the first installment of TCMS and probably won’t. For some reason I always wanted to hear this track. I figured it might be a fun thing to put on the holiday comps I like to make.
But the odd thing is the version of Christmas Twist on this disc is over 7 minutes long! Is it that long on the LP? It also has the organ intro (Jingle Bells) that Gordon Frewin mentioned (a high point fo rme). But it does go on and on and on. However edited down to about 3 minutes, it fits in nicely on my comp.
Is that Miss Ray and her ondioline on this track? Or is it just some sort of weird Farfisa style organ. There’s a nice section where she’s doing some woozy comping just before the three minute mark. There’s what sounds like a halfway decent sax solo at one point but it’s really undermixed. What a weird track this is! But frankly, anything over three minutes is overstaying its welcome. The 4 seems just about right.
LikeLike
MotownFan1962 said:
One of the vocalists (the one who does the ad-lib solos: “Oh, yeah!”, et al.) kind of sounds to me like Gino Parks (compare with his song “Fire”). What do you think?
LikeLike