Tags
Gordy G 7045 (A), July 1965
b/w Love Makes Me Do Foolish Things
(Written by Ivy Jo Hunter, Clarence Paul and Mickey Stevenson)
Tamla Motown TMG 530 (A), September 1965
b/w Love Makes Me Do Foolish Things
(Released in the UK under license through EMI/Tamla Motown)
Martha Reeves and the Vandellas had returned to form, critically and commercially, in the most spectacular fashion with Nowhere To Run, which should have heralded a string of chart-topping, Holland-Dozier-Holland penned hits for the group. Instead, this was their first release in five months, the sound of an unstruck iron slowly cooling in the corner.
What happened is really anyone’s guess; Holland-Dozier-Holland wouldn’t write and produce another Vandellas A-side for over a year and a half, busy instead with the Four Tops and the unprecedented success of the Supremes (when Motown protocol would previously have meant they “won” the Vandellas job until they turned in a flop, I suppose there just wasn’t time for them to oversee three top acts). But that doesn’t explain why it took the best part of half a year to follow up Nowhere To Run – especially as when the follow-up You’ve Been In Love Too Long did appear, it was written and produced by another team (the less-heralded but still rising Stevenson and Hunter) instead anyway.
In the absence of hard facts, entirely unsubstantiated darker rumours have gathered around this delay, mainly concerning Martha’s position within both the company and the group, which we won’t get into here. Rather, suffice to say that for whatever reason, right in the middle of Motown’s glorious Golden Age, in Motown’s most successful year to date, one of Motown’s top-drawer marquee names inexplicably found themselves left out in the cold for five months. Luckily for all of us, when they finally returned, they did so in style.
You’ve Been In Love Too Long, then, is a funny sort of a follow-up to Nowhere To Run, borrowing that record’s dynamic pummelling and adapting it to the kind of horn-driven pulse and power of the recent stormers turned in by the Marvelettes and Velvelettes, and then melding that power to the strange, alien cadences of Martha’s increasingly outlandish voice.
She sounds more out of control (and breath!) here than ever before, and yet there’s no doubt she knows exactly what she’s doing. It’s strange, even disconcerting, to hear her swooping around the octave in her not-quite-holler, not-quite-drawl, not-quite-croon – she’s certainly not out of tune, it’s more that she’s doing something very individual and personal with her voice, using it in a way akin to a cross between a bluesy patter and a battering ram.
One wonders whether it’s a deliberate attempt to ape the frustrated instancy of Dancing In The Street, a song recorded twice because a careless tape op consigned Martha’s heartfelt first take to oblivion, resulting in a genuinely angry reprise that became her signature performance. Whatever the reason, you can’t help but take notice, can’t help but remember it.
Really effective, too, in that Martha – who sells the kind of character she plays here, worldly sass with a hint of vindictive motivation, far better than many of her labelmates – turns out to be a great choice for an advice song on this form. Most of the Vandellas’ shining moments before now have focussed on Martha the wronged, Martha the wounded, Martha the defiant; she’s still all of those things here, by implication, but now the focus is shifted to the second person, so that this is nominally not a song about Martha’s narrator at all. Except, as we come to realise, it becomes entirely about Martha’s narrator before it’s through.
In a way, the topography of the ever-shifting cliques and musical territory at Motown had marked out this territory expressly for Martha and the Vandellas to inhabit. They were never going to be the Supremes – they were too loud and tough and dirty for that kind of dainty froideur, and the events surrounding this belated release must have made it clear they weren’t going to be getting the songs either. But instead, here they take possession of something new, something more dangerous and exciting and grown-up, something that had lain just out of the Marvelettes’ grasp and was now ceded forever: from here on in, this is the Vandellas’ home turf, and they occupy it with panache. And with a super-catchy chorus to boot. Brava.
MOTOWN JUNKIES VERDICT
(I’ve had MY say, now it’s your turn. Agree? Disagree? Leave a comment, or click the thumbs at the bottom there. Dissent is encouraged!)
You’re reading Motown Junkies, an attempt to review every Motown A- and B-side ever released. Click on the “previous” and “next” buttons below to go back and forth through the catalogue, or visit the Master Index for a full list of reviews so far.
(Or maybe you’re only interested in Martha Reeves & The Vandellas? Click for more.)
Brenda Holloway “Who’s Lovin’ You” |
Martha & the Vandellas “Love Makes Me Do Foolish Things” |
DISCOVERING MOTOWN |
---|
Like the blog? Listen to our radio show! |
Motown Junkies presents the finest Motown cuts, big hits and hard to find classics. Listen to all past episodes here. |
Dave L said:
Cause when the weeks of loneliness
Can be erased with just one sweet caress
…
When his wrongs look right,
But he always treats you bad
When you find little excuses
For all the sadness and abuses…
It’s like this, girls. Any man can ball, most can do it competently, and those who can’t can be trained. On that point, we’re little more complex than dogs. So to let some cheating, insincere fool get such dominion over your mind he’s convinced you he’s the only one who can rock your world on a mattress, is the most pitiful squandering of your finite, youthful years.
Set him on the curb, fix yourself up, and get back among the competition for a good one while you’re still young enough to do it.
That is exactly the message in “You’ve Been In Love Too Long,” and Martha lays it down with an exasperated authority to rival Aretha’s classic injunctions which are set to begin in about 18 months more. This was a muscular, angry Vandellas record, and we’d waited a long time since “Nowhere To Run” to get it. Perhaps the group’s own impatience to have new material out there in this most important Motown year was telling in the delivery, but by God, it’s great. (I don’t even have to have the record on to ‘play’ that menacing intro in my head!) Both sides of Gordy 7045 provided such riches they kept us happy through the entirely of the coming autumn months till snow was falling.
And like “Dancing In the Street” and “Ask The Lonely,” “In Love Too Long” is another example that William Stevenson didn’t get the kind of ‘name recognition’ he deserved among Motown’s other great writer/producers. He may not have chaired as many, but his best records stand shoulder to shoulder with those of HDH, Robinson & Whitfield. Your review isn’t up as I write this Steve, so I don’t know your grade, but if this isn’t a 10, it’s another 9 that’s scratching up the ceiling.
LikeLike
Landini said:
I’ll probably be the lone dissenting voice here. This record doesn’t do much for me. If anything I feel like it is an inferior version of “Danger Heartbreak Dead Ahead”. I never realized how similar the two songs are – especially in the lyrical content & arrangement. I can’t put my finger on it but to my ears, the production is a bit off. To me, Martha Reeves sounds almost shrill at times. I also feel like the arrangement is a bit shoddy. On the opening piano part, it sounds like the tape is dragging a bit. It is funny, “One Way Out” by Martha & the Vandellas happens to be playing right now & it hits me how much better a record that is (IMHO) when compared with “In Love Too Long”. Don’t get me wrong. This isn’t an awful record. It is a solid four on the floor dancer & it sounds fine when mixed into a playlist but it is far from my favorite Vandellas’ song. One part of the song I like is the part where Martha does that last “you’re a fool for your baby” before the instrumental break. She sounds particularly menacing! I’ll warn you in advance that I’m not real crazy about the flip side but I’ll wait for the review before i comment. (audible groan from the Motown Junkies people!) LOL! There’s one in every crowd right?
LikeLike
Dave L said:
Not at all, Landini. My own Vandellas groaner is “What Am I Gonna Do Without Your Love.” Sandwiched between “My Baby Loves Me” and “I’m Ready For Love” I’ve always had to strain -mostly unconvincingly- to claim that it’s a worthwhile Vandellas side. It’s not the group’s fault either, because I can tell when listening that Martha, Rosalind and Betty are trying like 10 men each to inject it with some excitement, but I just don’t think it was a particularly strong song. I’m not alone there; it was their lowest U.S. charter since the “Memories” breakthrough. And a strong, fresh hit right at that moment (May 1966) would have better pushed their new Greatest Hits like “My Guy” did for Mary Wells.
All the more frustrating when factoring jewels like “Leave It In The Hands of Love” and “No More Tearstained Makeup,” left neglected in albums.
LikeLike
Landini said:
Dave L,
Interesting. I’m not crazy about “What Am I Gonna Do” either. And you are right. Vandellas albums contain a lot of great untapped material. A lot critics tend to write off the “Sugar & Spice” album but I think it has some good tunes on it.
LikeLike
144man said:
I agree with you, Landini, that “You’ve Been In Love Too Long” is inferior to “Danger Heartbreak Dead Ahead”. DHDA flows along quite nicely, but YBILTL seems forced and cumbrous by comparison.
LikeLike
Landini said:
Barbara Acklin did a good remake of YBILTL which I actually like better than the original!
LikeLike
therealdavesing said:
Both Band tracks were Created by Clarence Paul. This came directly from Ivy
LikeLike
treborij said:
This is one of my favorite Vandella records; I love the way Martha sings it with that authoritative tone. And I can see the Vandellas behind her, nodding their heads confirming everything Martha is saying.
And I always loved the way the band sounded on this one (especially the brass). Going through these collections I’m always surpriseed at how many of my favorite Motown tracks from this period are Stevenson/Hunter productions. I totally agree with Dave L’s assessment of their status as among Motown’s premier producers. I think I’ll Keep Holding On is a 10 but this isn’t too far behind (for me) so I’d give it a 9.
LikeLike
Mary Plant said:
I’m with Dave L here – this is at least a nine, and on any given day would likely make my list of 50 10s. I love the drama in this song!
LikeLike
Henry said:
Mickey Stevenson had to leave for greener pastures. I agree he did not get the credit he deserves. If it was on another label this song would have been huge. Unfortunately, on West Grand Blvd. this song may not have been in the top 5 for songs released that month, let alone for the year. A solid 7.
LikeLike
Mickey The Twistin' Playboy said:
I agree that it’s an inferior version of Danger but I still like it. Clever and different intro from what we’ve heard from earlier Motown releases… a solid 7. An 8 on a good day.
LikeLike
John Plant said:
Just back from Russia – a terrific post to welcome me home. I love your review and thoroughly agree with the rating. I remember feeling a particular keen sense of outrage when, in Dave Marsh’s generally excellent book on the greatest 1000 singles, he refers to Martha as a ‘moderately gifted’ vocalist – your post does an excellent job of showing how – like all great singers – she turns her weaknesses into strengths. Has anyone ever imbued the word ‘happiness’ with more grief and bitterness?? Can’t wait for the flipside – whether we agree or not!
LikeLike
bogart4017 said:
I’ve never been a huge fan of those “finger-wagging” songs (They’re a dime a dozen) but this one is so danceable it qualifies as a solid 7. Stay away from the re-channeled stereo mix-it suffers in the translation (like for the 4 tops “I Can’t Help Myself”).
LikeLike
Landini said:
Question… I this the version that appeared on the first “Vandellas Greatest Hits” album? Just curious. Thanks!
LikeLike
bogart4017 said:
I’m not too sure since i have the mono “greatest hits” lp with the script writing. Later pressings (live the “Live!” Lp are stereo and sometimes have different mixes.
LikeLike
Damecia said:
FUNKY – the first word that comes to mind when I am forming an opinion about this track. Martha is incredible on this track. Her exasperation with whoever she’s addressing is palpable. She pulls you in and wears you out. I think Steve D. could have added 1 more point and made this a 9/10
LikeLike
benjaminblue said:
This is one of Martha’s best efforts! Her voice doesn’t rise to a harsh, histrionic, shrill level, as it too often seemed prone to do, and there is a tight focus is on the way she weaves her way through the instrumentation, navigating smoothly.
(In other songs, the driving bass and powerful drumming sometimes threaten to overwhelm her, and she seems to be at war with the musicians, shouting at and cajoling them; here especially with the solo trumpet, echoing her or harmonizing with her at times, there seems to be a collaborative, melodic and sometimes improvisational feel that is thrilling.)
My one complaint about this recording comes right after the instrumental break, when the Vandellas sing “girl, you’ve been in love too long.” This line should have been repeated, as it was at the beginning of the record. Without it, the final section of the song begins too abruptly, with no time to build; it’s just there, and the transition from the Vandellas chorus to Martha’s musings lacks the necessary moment where the first theme is once again established firmly before the contrasting verse begins.
LikeLike
Topkat said:
This is one of the most POWERFUL SONGS The Vandellas ever recorded !! I can NEVER listen to it just once : that wicked bass /drums combo at the beginning, and the ominous piano just before those thumping drums kick into high gear !! And then …just pure Funk and Dynamite !! This is the kind of power that only MARTHA & THE VANDELLAS, could DELIVER like NO OTHER Motown Female act !! This is pure Motown Gold ! I don’t care what ANYBODY else says !! A solid 10/10 !!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
krispepa said:
I can’t be the only one who hears a trace of Marvin Gaye’s late 60s hits (namely ‘I Heard It Through The Grapevine’ and ‘That’s The Way Love Is’) in the intro – low keyboards, the added pounding, even the high piano tinkling took me out a little bit when I first heard it. Anyway, it’s an absolute banger of a song and I think that it’s an absolute banger of a track, taking the pounding rhythm of ‘Nowhere To Run’ in an even darker, moodier, louder direction – a solid 8 or even a 9 in my book.
LikeLiked by 1 person