Tags
VIP 25027 (A), October 1965
b/w Poor Girl
(Written by James Dean, Edward Holland Jr. and R. Dean Taylor)
Canadian singer-songwriter R(ichard) Dean Taylor, who we’ve not seen here on Motown Junkies for the best part of two years (since the heartily stupid but sneakily likeable novelty rocker My Lady Bug Stay Away From That Beatle, a record Taylor himself has since disowned), probably wasn’t expected to resurface. But resurface he did; he’d go on to become a valued writer and stalwart recording artist in the late Sixties and early Seventies, and Motown were surely glad to have him around.
Still, there’s precious little evidence of what’s to come on Let’s Go Somewhere, which is awful. R-Dean (as I’m going to call him from now on) re-emerges from his long hibernation, bleary-eyed in the dazzling light of Motown’s Golden Age (which had sprung into life without him), clutching a new song co-written not only by the label’s golden boy Eddie Holland but also introducing one of the most underrated of all Motown writers in James Dean, and proceeds to make an embarrassing, cheesy stab at getting “down with the kids” delivered in the exact vocal style of Howard Crockett. If there was ever an R. Dean Taylor record that deserved to be disowned by its creator – every tape wiped, every music sheet burned, every vinyl copy buried in a landfill in Arizona – it is surely Let’s Go Somewhere.
The thing is, I generally really like R. Dean Taylor. I’ve seen him sneered at by Motown fans, some of whom didn’t want a pasty, pullover-wearing white guy claiming to make soul music, some of whom can’t forgive him for his country-tinged turn-of-the-decade output, but most of whom just find him too cheesy and mainstream for Motown. I’m going to defend him from those kinds of attacks when we get further down the line, because I think the guy had – has – plenty going for him: an ear for a tune, a knack for coming up with interesting ideas for songs, a nice voice. But then you come to something like Let’s Go Somewhere, which gets it wrong on almost every level, and you just cringe; the sound of R-Dean giving his detractors a free swing.
Briefly: this is a song where R-Dean’s narrator says he wants to go away, him and his partner, to a place where they can be free from discrimination. Instantly intriguing, right? Is this a daring social statement – an interracial relationship, a gay relationship, just a plea for tolerance in the face of prejudice? Nope, it’s R-Dean complaining that he can’t get a fair shake in his boring old straight-laced home town, because he’s a daring young man, a wild free spirit, a long-haired hippy.
R. Dean Taylor (pictured left), a long-haired hippy.
Right.
It’s the least convincing thing in the world, and what’s worse is that I can’t work out whether it’s meant to be funny or serious, whether R-Dean is siding with – or poking fun at – the workshy hippies or the button-down squares. Either way, the implications are horrific; either it’s a feeble, cack-handed comedy record, the likes of which we’ve not seen on Motown since the long-gone, unlamented Chuck-a-Lucks, or else it’s sincere and this is what three of the best writers in Motown history really thought hippies sounded like. Leaving aside the wisdom of what is a second novelty record from R-Dean attempting to cash in on a newsworthy trend, it’s a colossal misjudgement, underlining its own deeply square credentials at every turn.
Also, it’s a powerfully annoying tune in its own right, blaring and bothersome and just plain irritating, capped off by a high-tempo bashed tambourine which skitters its way through the entire track, setting teeth on edge right the way along until you wish someone had put their fist through the sodding thing. And R-Dean’s spoken intro is some of the worst acting we’ve yet seen, emphasising just how badly miscast he is, what a terrible idea this all is. And it just sounds unbelievably patronising – not to hippies, I doubt many of whom heard this, but to its intended audience. I don’t just mean lyrically (although, bloody hell, come on), but musically too, the sort of obvious chord progression that any of the Motown musicians could have knocked out in their sleep. That ear-bashing tambourine is just the rancid icing on the inedible cake.
It sounds like someone’s first attempt at writing a song, the product of a jam session, something that should have been played through once for a laugh and then binned forever. Instead, like that tambourine player, everyone seems to have decided the best way is just to commit to it, to put their heads down and grimly plough along in the hope that it’ll turn out okay. It doesn’t – it’s probably the least cool thing we’ve seen here on Motown Junkies in at least three years, not to mention the musically sloppiest, and it only gets worse with repeated plays.
This would have struggled to scrape a couple of marks in 1961 – the backing vocals are quite pretty, and that’s about it – but here at the end of 1965, amateur hour is over, I’m afraid. Just dismal. Sorry, R-Dean.
MOTOWN JUNKIES VERDICT
(I’ve had MY say, now it’s your turn. Agree? Disagree? Leave a comment, or click the thumbs at the bottom there. Dissent is encouraged!)
You’re reading Motown Junkies, an attempt to review every Motown A- and B-side ever released. Click on the “previous” and “next” buttons below to go back and forth through the catalogue, or visit the Master Index for a full list of reviews so far.
(Or maybe you’re only interested in R. Dean Taylor? Click for more.)
The Dalton Boys “Something’s Bothering You” |
The Monitors “Say You” |
DISCOVERING MOTOWN |
---|
Like the blog? Listen to our radio show! |
Motown Junkies presents the finest Motown cuts, big hits and hard to find classics. Listen to all past episodes here. |
144man said:
The first time I heard this on the radio, I was in a different room. As soon as the sax-break started, I went rushing in as I instantly identified it as a Motown record. I rate this as Average rather than Awful as it doesn’t plumb the depths of Ray Oddis and Joel Sebastian.
LikeLike
MotownFan1962 said:
Maybe it’s just the fact that I love a good tambourine-bashing or The Andantes’ lovely harmonies (as well as the harmony between Mr. Taylor and the other as-of-yet-unknown male vocalist), but I like this song a lot. The backing track is danceable and whistleable. Sure, the lead vocal is kind of shaky, but (at least to my ears) The Andantes and the Unknown Male Vocalist (Stuart Avig of The Valadiers?) do a great deal of the heavy lifting.
And it sure beats the hell out of “Who’s Lovin’ You”.
LikeLike
motownfan1962 said:
Well, the mystery of the unidentified harmony vocalist has been solved, it seems (and I was wrong about the gender; ’twas a woman singing that harmony). Specifically, it’s Sally Fuhrman of Rick, Robin & Him.
Taken from the description from Tomovox’s video “Discover Motown! 3 To Go- Rick, Robin And Him (and a bonus song)”:
“Mr. [Ron] Fuhrman (also of Rick, Robin & Him) also confirms that it is Sally’s voice heard on R. Dean Taylor’s “Let’s Go Somewhere”…”
LikeLike
Olivier said:
Whoa you’re harsh with this one.
Contrary to your marking system description, I think most people could like it.
It reminds me of Lee Hazlewood’s super catchy country pop, I give it a 5.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John Winstanley said:
I first heard this as the flip side to “There’s a Ghost in My House” and got to say I preferred it to the “hit” side. Love the tambourine and the backing vocalists but agree. the spoken intro is a bit corny. Not the best of Motown but certainly not the worst, I’d give it a 6.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Nixon Administration said:
You prefer this to Ghost? Wow.
I love this site. This is by some considerable distance my least favourite R Dean Taylor record, it annoyed me to the point of physical irritation. But I’ve already long since learned that my 1s and 10s will be other people’s 5s, if not their 10s and 1s respectively, and I find it absolutely fascinating.
Keep on disagreeing, people. Especially if you take the time to explain why you love something I hate, or vice versa. And thanks John for a great comment 🙂
LikeLike
nafalmat said:
I feel your rating of 1 out of 10 is a little harsh. The idea lyrically of this song must surely have been influenced by Sonny Bono’s “Laugh at Me” which was a current hit at the time this was recorded. Both songs were about young long-haired drop-outs who felt they didn’t fit into the established society. This is certainly a better record than Bono’s. It has a great production and moves like crazy. It’s not a classic by any means but over all I would rate it as a decent pop record.
LikeLike
Johnny P. said:
Regarding Motown writer R. Dean Taylor didn’t he have a good selling single titled: “Indiana Wants Me” ?
This song was missed in the bio.
Johnny P. Detroit, Mi
LikeLike
The Nixon Administration said:
Hi Johnny,
That one came out in 1970, so we’ve got quite a ways to go yet before we reach it on this blog!
LikeLike
Robb Klein said:
I just don’t like Taylor’s singing at all. Secondly, I don’t like his songwriting, especially the tunes (melodies). I don’t like the structure of this song. I like several separate elements of the background tracks, but they are in all the wrong places. I HATE the talking intro. Even disliking this strongly, I’d give it a 2. I think that the background track by The Funk Brothers has some excellent instrument playing on it, but, it’s not my kind of song. I don’t really like “There’s A Ghost In My House”, either. It is also not my style of song. But, I appreciate the great job that The Funk Brothers did on it. The drumming is super. I wonder if that is Uriel Jones? The sax is very nice, as well. I’d probably give most R. Dean Taylor songs grades from 1 to 3.
LikeLike
nafalmat said:
Taylor was obviously best at writing straight pop material, this is evident on the song ‘Window Shopping’ first released by the Messegers on SOUL in 1967. This is a brilliant pop song, obviously influenced by the Monkees Neil Diamond hits, but to my mind equally as good as both ‘I’m a believer’ and ‘A little bit me a little bit you’. The Messenger’s record bombed, but if the Monkees had rleased this with the same backing track, they would have had another #1 record.
LikeLike
Slade Barker said:
I enjoy this one, too. It’s a bit bubblegummy, yes, but it’s catchy, and it’s taking the Motown Sound in a new direction.
LikeLike
Slade Barker said:
P.S. And by the way, outside of hardcore rock band members, this WAS long hair in1965! Also, people were really horrible to folks with Beatle-type cuts in that era. “Are you a boy or a girl?” or “Get a haircut!” were the common remarks yelled out by total strangers. And this sounded even better to me on second listen. Jeez, Nixon, you gave it a 1, but it’s as good, or almost as good, as the Monitors single you’re about to give an 8 to! They both probably deserved 5’s. This is the first 1 I’ve seen from you that was totally undeserved.
LikeLike